THE WEAKEST LINK

Vice Admiral Horatio Lord Nelson, by Lemuel Francis Abbott - courtesy of Wikipedia.com

Vice Admiral Horatio Lord Nelson, by Lemuel Francis Abbott – courtesy of Wikipedia.com

Boldness, bravery, and a flair for the unconventional had served Admiral Horatio Nelson well throughout his naval career. He was never a man to shy from danger nor to fail to follow his instincts although not every instance had been successful.  Born of what would now be thought of as an upper middle class family, Nelson entered his majesty’s navy due largely to the influence of his uncle, Maurice Suckling. Suckling’s patronage was not misplaced for young Nelson proved himself to be an energetic young man possessed of a a quick and inquisitive mind. He also had the benefit of serving under the tutelage of several of the premiere British naval leaders of his time.

This combination of dashing bravado, incisive intellect and a penchant for calculated risk taking had served Nelson well. These traits came out early in his career. Once, on an expedition to find the legendary Northwest Passage his ship was in danger of becoming icebound. While the crew was working to turn the ship back, his commander noticed that Nelson, having seen a polar bear on the ice, took off in pursuit of it. When confronted with the question of why he would engage in such a rash act Nelson replied, “I wished, Sir, to get the skin for my father.” Rather than being punished for what might be interpreted as dereliction of duty, his commander appears to have good naturedly circulated this possibly apocryphal story as an example of the young man’s “spirit.”

Whether as the result of patronage, luck, or indulgence, Nelson had survived two potentially career destroying incidents. The first occurred in 1783 when he, with a force of 167 naval and marine personnel grossly underestimated the strength of the French forces garrisoning the Turks Islands. Nelson landed his small force but found that the defenders of the island were well entrenched. Despite a spirited bombardment, Nelson was ultimately forced to withdraw. Several of his fellow officers complained about his conduct of the operation. Despite this significant criticism from his fellows, Nelson got off without so much as a reprimand from Admiral Samuel Hood.

The second incident occurred some fourteen years later when, in 1797, at the Battle of Cape St. Vincent, Nelson disobeyed the orders of Admiral Sir John Jervis. Being to the rear of the British line, Nelson, impatient for action, broke position and engaged the van of the Spanish fleet. His third rate 74 gun ship took on three Spanish warships mounting 130 guns, 112 guns, and 80 guns. Nelson’s ship, HMS Captain essentially had to be rescued by the timely intervention of HMS Culloden.  Given some relief from his predicament and needing to recover from his impulsive actions, Nelson himself led a boarding party across to the 80 gun San Nicolas, forcing her surrender to him.

As luck would have it, the 112 gun San Josef, coming to San Nicolas’ aid, became entangled with her and Nelson seized the opportunity to board and force her surrender as well.

Nothing sells like success and Nelson, despite having imperiled the fleet, managed to capture two of the four Spanish first raters that day. His victory, and Jervis’ personal like for the rash young captain saved him an official reprimand. It also denied him mention in the official battle report. Nelson mounted a letter writing campaign that reflected well on his performance in the battle. However, several other officers, Rear-Admiral William Parker among them, contested the veracity of the events as Nelson reported them and questioned if he would have succeeded without the support and assistance of far more ships than Nelson himself reported.

Cuthbert Collingwood Baron Collingwood by Henry Howard - courtesy of Wikipedia.com

Cuthbert Collingwood Baron Collingwood by Henry Howard – courtesy of Wikipedia.com

Nelson’s frequent collaborator and ling time acquaintance was Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood. Like Nelson, Collingwood was present at the Battle of Cape St. Vincent although he exercised a greater degree of restraint than his eventual superior. The two collaborated and served together with the British West Indies and Mediterranean squadrons.  Collingwood was the more steadfast of the two but he could also be seduced into going along with some of Nelson’s riskier plans. He also bowed to Nelson’s cliquishness which was to sow the seeds of disaster for the British Fleet, and alter the course of history.

On the eve of Trafalgar, Nelson and Collingwood were joined by Admiral William Carnegie, 7th Earl Northesk. Unlike Nelson with his upper middle class origins or Collingwood with his even humbler antecedents, Northesk was the son of a peer and admiral. Northesk was a steady officer schooled in the traditions and methods of the Royal Navy. He was advanced to the rank of Post Captain by Admiral Rodney himself in 1782.

However, Northesk found himself in a difficult position in 1796. He was embroiled in the Nore mutiny. Northesk, having some sympathy with the mutineers’ grievances and imbued with a strong sense of noblesse oblige, was released by the striking sailors and charged with taking their demands to London. Unlike Admiral Lord Howe who later succeeded, Northesk failed to win any concessions for the aggrieved sailors and, in light of this and his failure to even restore order on his ship, chose to resign his commission.

Northesk remained out of the navy for the next eleven years until he was reinstated by the Admiralty in 1803. He received his full seniority as a rear admiral and was given command of a first rater, HMS Britannia, in which he joined Nelson’s fleet.

William Carnegie 7th Earl Northesk 1758-1831 by Thomas Phillips - courtesy of Wikipedia.com

William Carnegie 7th Earl Northesk 1758-1831 by Thomas Phillips – courtesy of Wikipedia.com

Northesk, unlike Collingwood, was neither an intimate of nor collaborator with Nelson. In fact, he had never even served with Nelson before and as such was not a member of the so called Band of Brothers.

He joined Nelson’s fleet shortly before the battle was to take place. Despite being the third in command of the fleet, he was largely excluded from the pre-engagement planning.

Thus, when disaster struck Britain on that fateful October day in 1805, Northesk, deprived of Nelson’s orders, lacking familiarity with the flamboyant man’s methods, and strongly motivated to not be the cause of needless British deaths, reverted to his traditions and earlier training. Thus it was that one empire was sorely wounded, another rose to parity and the World took its first step to a cataclysm that would profoundly alter history.

Trafalgar - courtesy of wikidiscoverypedia.com

Trafalgar – courtesy of wikidiscoverypedia.com

TURNING POINTS

Great storms announce themselves with a simple breeze. (Ladyhawke: 1985)

In every life there are turning points. Times when decisions are made that affect the course of events from then on. A decision made too soon, like a fruit picked early, may rot rather than ripen. The reverse is true as well. A decision made too late may rob one of an opportunity. This is true not only of individuals but of nations.

Pierre Charles de Villeneuve – courtesy of http://www.herodote.net

Pierre Charles de Villeneuve – courtesy of http://www.herodote.net

In 1805 the combined Franco-Spanish fleet was expected to play a pivotal role in Napoleon’s plan to invade England. His admiral, Pierre-Charles Villeneuve, can probably best be described as a grand schemer of middling abilities. Villeneuve’s major claim to fame appears to have been the fact that his ship Guillaume Tell was one of only two French ships to escape the defeat at the Battle of the Nile in 1798. Because of this dubious achievement, Napoleon apparently considered him to be “a lucky man.” Considering the equally dubious outcome of Napoleon’s campaign in Egypt, perhaps that is an understandable sentiment. However, that aside, by 1805 it had become clear to the Emperor that luck was not enough and that Villeneuve was not up to the task of carrying out the naval portion of the planned invasion of England.

Disenchanted with Villeneuve’s wild run to the West Indies and back as well as his subsequent inaction at Cadiz, Napoleon determined to replace him with a man he hoped would be a more aggressive commander, François Étienne de Rosily-Mesros.  Rosily hailed from a naval family. His father commanded the Brest fleet under the Bourbons. Rosily demonstrated an aggressive spirit in was and in peace. In 1780 he was awarded the croix de Saint-Louis for his spirited action against a Royal Navy cutter helped save the frigate Belle-Poule. This is the same action that marked the onset of French assistance to the rebellious American colonies.

Rosily was also keen scientist and innovator. In 1774, he made a series of frantic visits to ports throughout British Isles

François Étienne de Rosily-Mesros  courtesy of wilipedia.com

François Étienne de Rosily-Mesros courtesy of wilipedia.com

and returned to France with numerous innovations and materials that benefited his own navy. Among them was the chain pump system. He was also an accomplished and respected hydrographic engineer. His work in that field took him to such naval hubs as La Spezia, Boulogne, and Antwerp. Rosily even provided the information Napoleon needed for his Egyptian expedition.

Rosily had risen to the rank of rear admiral and was the inspector general of naval chart and plans department. He is reputed to have refused the command of the French fleet for the Egyptian adventure which left him in a somewhat awkward position vis-à-vis Villeneuve, the ‘lucky man’ of the French Navy.

By 1805, Rosily yearned to return to command but, having been inactive at sea for some 15 years, he needed a way to justify his worthiness for it. He aggressively petitioned for an advance in rank within the Légion d’Honneur, this after only having been inducted into it two years before and promoted to the rank of commander only a year after that.

Rosily’s machinations were viewed with pique by Napoleon. He wrote a scathing letter of denial in which he described him as a man “who remain[ed] in Paris [who could] not compare [himself] to men who exposed themselves to all the dangers one runs at sea…” Napoleon further stated that, “… we must remind [him] and put [him] in [his] place.”

The Emperor Napoleon I In His Study  by Jacques Louis David  -  courtesy Wikipedia.com

The Emperor Napoleon I In His Study by Jacques Louis David – courtesy Wikipedia.com

Despite this harsh rebuke and his years of shore duty, it became clear that Rosily would be a superior choice to command the Franco Spanish fleet over Villeneuve. Napoleon might very well have chosen Étienne Eustache Bruix however that august admiral died of tuberculosis by March 1805.

Thus it was that in July 1805, the 57 year old François Étienne de Rosily-Mesros found himself en route to Madrid with orders to assume command of the fleet. He was advised by the Emperor to, “Break out, beat the enemy, and all will be righted”.

The letter advising Villeneuve of his dismissal was lost by a clerk at the naval headquarters. Consequently, on August 15, 1805 he was greatly surprised to find Rossily standing before him with clear orders to assume command from their Emperor. The disgraced Villeneuve retuned to France. In April of 1806, Villeneuve could bear his shame no longer. Reeling from his dismissal and Rosily’s victory over the British fleet at Trafalgar, he committed suicide in the Hôtel de la Patrie in Rennes. Some suggested it was with the assistance of Fouché’s agents; but that is mere speculation.

THERE BE AIRSHIPS HERE

Welcome to the alternate history blog for MA Scott. Beginning in September 2013 we will explore the events that changed history forever. Discover how a freak accident during a noble scientific experiment, a chance occurrence in war, and random events that go somewhat differently from our own time line profoundly alter what happens thereafter.

We will chart not only the course of empires but the lives of the individuals who populate them. Some of those people will be well known. Others will be lured out from the dusty corners of history. Still others will be unknown – at least in the beginning.

Please join us as we tread down a road that leads to an exciting Steampunk world filled with wonder, invention, danger, and more.

In addition to the history of our Steampunk world, we will introduce you to some of the obscure figures and lost marvels that actually existed – and have inspired our vision of them.

We look forward to your comments, suggestions, and reactions to our reinterpretation of the World.

Deepest gratitude to  Jane Austen, Meljean Brook, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Samuel Clemens, Robert Conroy, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Richard Dreyfuss, William Gibson, Tracy Grant, H Rider Haggard, CS Harris, Robert Harris, Harry Harrison, Mark Hodder, Jayne Ann Krentz, Alan Moore, Bruce Sterling, SM Sterling, Harry Turtledove,  Jules Verne, HG Wells, Scott Westerfield and a host of others.  Your were the inspiration for what we have done so far and what is to come.